Of heartbreak and smartphones

I stood under this quote at about 2 p.m. Monday during a visit the Newseum. The words on the wall just seemed to fit my final week as a newspaper intern, thankful to be pursuing the career I loved at age 21.

Then two bombs went off at the Boston marathon.

I got the news first on my phone as a notification from the Washington Post, and my breath caught in my throat. I immediately opened Twitter and scanned through a burst of updates, then walked out to the Newseum lobby, where a giant TV screen showed the latest from CNN. I stood in silence with the other museum visitors, thankful not to be alone.

What followed, of course, was a heavy week for the nation, and an especially difficult week for journalists. I wasn’t sure whether that H.L. Mencken quote was true any more. Journalism is good and necessary, but it isn’t always fun. Sometimes, it means chasing the currents of a nation’s grief.

Tragedy after tragedy came in quick succession until it was just too much, and we became convinced that the sadness would end when the weekend came.

Since I wasn’t covering any of the national stories, I kept track of most of them through Twitter or by watching cable news in the newsroom. It was hard to sleep some nights, like when the fertilizer plant exploded in Texas, and each new refresh of my Twitter feed brought more bad news.

Journalists like Jay Hicks in Texas and Taylor Dobbs and Wesley Lowery in Massachusetts used Twitter well for on-the-scene, no-nonsense reporting. But for every person reporting accurate facts, there were a dozen others saying and tweeting nothing but misinformation and guesswork, filling airtime (leading to some truly awful journalistic mistakes). I knew this, yet I couldn’t look away. Maybe it was an attempt to cope by distracting myself from the silence.

I think I followed the news too closely this week. Did it do us any good to catch bits of information and speculation from random people before professionals could write an article to help us to make sense of it?

I was only nine years old on September 11, 2001. I remember watching the news at school, and not much else from that day. The way we consume news (I hate that verb, but it’s necessary) has changed so much since then.

Jesse Washington wrote about this for the Associated Press:

In 2001, we could walk away from our televisions. In 2013, bad news follows us everywhere. It’s on our computers at work and home, on our phones when we call our loved ones, on social media when we talk to our friends.

We can avoid Twitter and spend time with people we love instead. But there’s this new obsession to know news first and share it, to be in tune with the world, even if the world is breaking our hearts. At least, that’s what I feel. More from the AP:

“There’s no place to run, no place to hide,” said Dr. Stuart Fischoff, a professor of media psychology at California State University in Los Angeles. “It’s like perpetual shock. There’s no off button. That’s relatively unprecedented. We’re going to have to pay the price for that.”

Farhad Manjoo also wrote about this on Friday in a piece called “Breaking News is Broken”:

When you first hear about a big story in progress, run to your television. Make sure it’s securely turned off.

Next, pull out your phone, delete your Twitter app, shut off your email, and perhaps cancel your service plan. Unplug your PC….

Get a good night’s rest. In the morning, don’t rush out of bed. Take in the birdsong. Brew a pot of coffee.

Finally, load up your favorite newspaper’s home page. Spend about 10 minutes reading a couple of in-depth news stories about the events of the day. And that’s it: You’ve now caught up with all your friends who spent the past day and a half going out of their minds following cable and Twitter.

[The whole post is worth reading.]

I read the full story of the Boston bombing suspects in the Washington Post today — the physical copy of the newspaper — sitting at my neighborhood coffee shop, taking it slow. It was so much nicer than reading Twitter.

Sometimes, I miss the old media. It seems more humane to our grief.

Your tweets, their brand name

The New York Times’ Jerusalem bureau chief Jodi Rudoren has drawn criticism for what she’s posted on Twitter, most recently during the Gaza conflict. Now, the Times has assigned an editor to review her tweets.

Rudoren calls the move “constructive and cautious,” though Poytner reports that at least one journalist has dismissed the decision as a misguided attempt to maintain journalistic objectivity.

It makes me wonder whether the common Twitter bio disclaimers that say “RTs don’t equal endorsements” — or Rudoren’s version, “Tweets mean hey, look at this, nothing more” — actually mean anything in practice. Journalists are still held accountable for what they tweet, even if it’s just a link to a news article, tweeted without commentary.

The Times’ public editor Margaret Sullivan wrote about Rudoren’s tweets in a blog post yesterday, finally settling on this key question:

Do Ms. Rudoren’s personal musings, as they have seeped out in unfiltered social media posts (and, notably, have been criticized from both the right and the left), make her an unwise choice for this crucially important job?

Sullivan concludes that since Rudoren’s reporting is “exemplary,” her tweets don’t disqualify her for the job.

We all know that we’re supposed to be careful about what we post online, but it seems that journalists, of all people, don’t actually have the luxury of posting “personal musings.” That’s one of the self-imposed restrictions that comes with the privilege of being a journalist.

It seems extreme to assign an editor to a journalist’s Twitter to manage risk, but I expect that we’ll see more of it, particularly with journalists tweeting about sensitive topics. This is where the journalist’s “personal brand” and professional brand collide.

Lessons from live-tweeting an event

  1. Last week, I had the privilege of attending the Religion Newswriters Association conference (Oct. 4-6, 2012). I won’t attempt to summarize the actual content of the conference here; instead, this Storify post highlights what I thought were some of the most effective #RNA2012 tweets.
    Heads up: I let my followers know I’d be live-tweeting and explained the hashtag I would be using. Nothing annoys me more than seeing an acronym in a hashtag and having no idea what it stands for.
  2. aprilburbank
    I’m happy to be attending the Religion Newswriters Association conference today through the weekend – tweeting with #RNA2012

    Thu, Oct 04 2012 06:59:58
  3. ColumbiaFAVS
    What happens when a bunch of #religion reporters get together? Check out tweets from #RNA2012 (Religion Newswriters Association conference).

    Thu, Oct 04 2012 20:03:28
  4. Introducing a session: I thought it would be helpful to introduce a panel on Mormonism by naming each panelist’s basic job description. Wes Gentry did it by naming the organizations each panelist was associated with, while Menachem Wecker did it by mentioning the panelists’ Twitter handles.
  5. aprilburbank
    Starting a panel on Mormons in public life, feat. professor Terryl Givens, blogger/author Jana Riess & author Darius Gray #RNA2012

    Sat, Oct 06 2012 07:13:08
  6. westongentry
    Mormonism #RNA2012 panelists:
    -Terryl Givens, University of Richmond
    -Jana Riess, Patheos Press
    -Darius Gray, Tesla Corp.

    Sat, Oct 06 2012 07:08:56
  7. mwecker
    next panel on Mormonism in the spotlight #RNA2012: Terryl Givens (of @urichmond), Jana Riess (@janariess), and Darius Gray

    Sat, Oct 06 2012 07:05:36
  8. My most successful tweet: This was my most retweeted and favorited post of the weekend. During one of the sessions, a panelist read a 6-point list, and most people hurried to write it down. I figured that the list must be available online somewhere, and — lo and behold! — I was able to tweet the link.
  9. aprilburbank
    Here’s the list of reporters’ mistakes on Mormons that Jana Riess used: http://www.religionnews.com/blogs/jana-riess/the-top-six-mistakes-reporters-make-about-mormons1 #RNA2012

    Sat, Oct 06 2012 07:43:02
  10. Value-added tweets: Rather than merely paraphrasing information from the sessions, some attendees tracked down relevant links online. These links were worth the extra time and effort.
  11. msweas
    Here’s more about what she’s taking about with Christians seeking government benefits: http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/politics/5834/caste_first,_christ_second,_for_some_indian_christians/ #RNA2012 @hinduamerican

    Sat, Oct 06 2012 06:15:56
  12. cascheller
    What Darius Gray didn’t say is that other religious groups used “mark of Cain” scripture to justify racism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curse_and_mark_of_Cain #RNA2012
  13. Photo tweets: Panel discussions are notoriously difficult to photograph well, but the DeMoss Group tweeted this photo, which helped followers to understand what was going on.
  14. DeMossNews
    Our founder @MarkDeMoss on a panel discussing faith at politics at #RNA2012 yesterday afternoon http://yfrog.com/nvl34uej (via @DeMossGroup)

    Sat, Oct 06 2012 13:21:59
  15. Concise statistics: Numbers and facts work well for tweets if they’re simple and couched in enough context so that people outside the event can understand them.
  16. pattondodd
    DeMoss: At that much ballyhooed Texas mtg & straw poll of evangelical leaders last spring, Romney got 4 votes (of 150). #RNA2012

    Fri, Oct 05 2012 12:17:06
  17. Ptsbrian
    Top 5 Long-term life goals? Gen X, Boomers #1 answer is “To get married and have family.” Millennials #1 is “get close to God.” #rna2012

    Fri, Oct 05 2012 10:41:10
  18. cascheller
    Darius Gray says less Mormon racism now than in past, esp. since 1978 priesthood change. Continuous black LDS presence since 1832 #RNA2012
  19. aprilburbank
    Q: Can you be evangelical & in favor of gay marriage? Robert Jones: only 58% of evangelicals under 40 oppose it #RNA2012

    Fri, Oct 05 2012 05:56:52
  20. Selective tweeting: Some people, like Cathy Lynn Grossman, didn’t tweet during the sessions, but tweeted the most interesting fact(s) afterward. This helped to simplify cluttered Twitter feeds.
  21. CLGrossman
    Learned a lot from #RNA2012 #Mormon epxerts panel. Mormons’ Doctrine Covenants require to believe Constitution is inspired document.
  22. The two-parter: I couldn’t fit these linked facts into a single tweet without cutting them down too much, so I tweeted them in succession. I tried to add enough context to the second tweet that it could stand on its own. I’m not sure how effective this is… There’s a reason tweets are limited to 140 characters!
  23. aprilburbank
    Sally Steenland: 2 stories not being told: 1- What does rapidly changing racial demographic mean for religion in US? #RNA2012

    Thu, Oct 04 2012 10:59:04
  24. aprilburbank
    Steenland: 2 – We also need stories about religious liberty and Muslim Americans #RNA2012

    Thu, Oct 04 2012 11:00:27
  25. Direct quote: It’s hard to tweet accurate quotes, so I usually tried to paraphrase the speakers as accurately as possible. This was the one direct quote that I used.
  26. aprilburbank
    Gray: “There are answers without having to run and hide” on LDS church and race #RNA2012

    Sat, Oct 06 2012 07:38:23
  27. Color commentary: I enjoyed reading tweets like these from other people at the conference, especially during the less-interesting sessions:
  28. janariess
    Fashion alert: Both Dem advisors have blue in their ties. DeMoss has a red tie. The journalist has no tie. #rna2012

    Fri, Oct 05 2012 11:30:18
  29. jon_fitzgerald
    Looking around the room at people typing, tweeting, tagging, juggling multiple windows and tabs and I feel very much at home. #RNA2012
  30. Recruiting and common interest: It made sense to use the hashtag for topics that would be of interest to people at the conference. Sarah Pulliam Bailey used the hashtag to promote a job opening:
  31. spulliam
    People of #rna2012, I am hiring an online editor. Please apply to come work at @Odysseynetworks http://odysseynetworks.org/jobs
  32. Put down that phone: Although Twitter was an integral part of this conference, we were encouraged not to tweet during two sessions: (1) A panel that revealed embargoed poll data…
  33. leslieps918
    Not allowed to Tweet about next session. Mum’s the word. #RNA2012
  34. CLGrossman
    No deep conspiracy at #RNA2012 no-tweeting session. We’re just getting data we need to write responsibly when the embargo lifts on Tuesday.
  35. mwecker
    #RNA2012 panel is embargoed. “———,” says ——-. “————————–!” that was a great point, trust me…

    Sat, Oct 06 2012 08:24:39
  36. … And (2) while we were listening to a conversation with Eckhart Tolle, when we were told that Twitter would distract us from the “now.” We all probably got a lot more out of the session because we weren’t constantly trying to find something to tweet.
  37. leslieps918
    Is Tweeting OK if you’re trying to live in the now? #RNA2012
  38. pgfaith
    Tolle doesn’t synthesize well into tweets. #RNA2012

    Fri, Oct 05 2012 13:06:32
  39. Ptsbrian
    On second thought, I am concluding this conversation isn’t conducive to live-tweeting. I’ll be in the now after all. #rna2012

    Fri, Oct 05 2012 13:08:19
  40. Watch from home: One of our sessions was streaming live online, so Religion & Politics tweeted a link to the website so that people could follow along using more than just Twitter.
  41. ReligPolitics
    Panel coming up at #RNA2012 with campaign reps from Romney and Obama faith outreach teams. Watch here: http://ow.ly/efW8L
  42. I learned a lot about live-tweeting from #RNA2012, and — even better! — I met a lot of great journalists by following the hashtag. Check out more tips about live-tweeting events in these articles:
    12-step guide on how to live-tweet an event
    What every young journalist should know about using Twitter
    14 Tips to Live Tweet Events Effectively